GEOL-3101Course Assessment and Feedback - Result 2001 and 2002Overall Results
|
||
OVERALL RESULTS out of 371 answers (from a total of 9 students out a total of 12).
|
Questions 1 to 41 relative to the course and lecturer.![]() |
Normalized results. The top graph is relative to the course and lecturer (question 1 to 41), the graph at the bottom is relative to students involvement (questions 42 to 46).![]() |
What I discovered
Many students had very little computer skills and only a few had very strong expertise. It turns out that many students get into trouble with simple tasks such as retrieving an image embedded in an email message, or sending an email with an attachment, or even copying a file from a hard drive to a floppy disk.
I found that many students did struggled to source and synthesise information into a coherent eReport. Some eReport topics were fully contained in one single textbook chapter. Even in this favourable circumstance students were having difficulties synthesising information and understanding basic concepts. When information spread across a number of sources: textbooks, books, papers, it was obvious that the exercise was too difficult, eReport were filled with irrelevant information and repetition, whereas fundamental concepts where not included.
After the first set of eReport I decided to suggest for each topics a 'Table of Content' to help students with the organization of the information and help them to write a relevant report. I also insisted to have a descent introduction presenting both the significance of the topics and the organization of the eReport. Improvement was immediate, eReport contained nearly exclusively information relevant to the topics, and nearly every important aspect was covered. However, information was delivered in a succession of paragraphs with little attempt to link the different sections together.
The main problem (in addition to coping with computer) was still the sourcing the information. At the beginning of the course a few textbooks were suggested, and a list of paper was provided with important papers emphasized. I made clear to the student that, except for a couple of topics, 99% of the information they needed was contained in textbooks. I felt that most student were not using textbook at all, something that I already knew from past experience.
After the second set of eReport I decided to suggest, in addition to a 'Table of Content" a limited number of textbook chapters where student could get the information they needed. This however didn't improved students ability to synthesise the information. Too many eReports read like a succession of sections with little linkage.
In terms of organization I found that students did not work in pair as they were supposed to but separately, each of them working on a different section of the eReport. Some students were also relying on friends to turn their report into an electronic format. Nothing wrong with that except that some students did not bother learning from their friends how to do it.
I believe that most students understood and acknowledged the importance of becoming a self-learner and the importance of improving their computer skills. However I feel that this approach may not suit students with part-time jobs or other time-consuming extra-curriculum activities.
What's next
One student suggested introducing each topics with a 40mn lecture, it is indeed a good idea. This will certainly help the student to see the links between the various topics. In order to compensate for the time invested in lecture, topics will have to be less general and more focused.
P. Rey
Students' feedback did improve with respect to last year. I have introduced a lecture component which focus on math and physics intensive issues. I have reduced the number of electronic reports and limited their respective scope. This course on on good tracks.