Lithospheric Scale Gravitational Flow: The Impact of Body Forces on Orogenic Processes from Archaean to Phanaerozoic


P. Rey* and G. Houseman**

* School of Geosciences, Edgeworth Building F05,
The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
** School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK


In Buiter, S. and Schreurs, G., (eds), Analogue and Numerical Modelling of Crustal-Scale Processes. Geological Society Special Publication, Vol.253, 153-167.


ABSTRACT

In the Archaean, the combination of warmer continental geotherm with a lighter sub-continental lithospheric mantle suggests that gravitational forces played a more significant role in continental lithospheric deformation. To test this hypothesis, we compare the evolution of the deformation and the regional state of stress in ‘Archaean-like’ and ‘Phanerozoic-like’ lithospheres submitted to the same boundary conditions in a triaxial stress-field with imposed convergence in one direction. For plausible physical parameters, thickening of normal to cold Phanerozoic lithospheres produces relatively weak buoyancy forces, either extensional or compressional. In contrast, for Archaean continental lithospheres, or for anomalously warm Phanerozoic lithospheres, lateral gravitationally-driven flow prevents significant thickening. This conclusion is broadly consistent with: (1) the relative homogeneity of the erosional level now exposed at the surface of Archaean cratons, (2) the sub-aerial conditions that prevailed during the emplacement of up to 20 km of greenstone cover, (3) the relatively rare occurrence in the Archaean record of voluminous detrital sediments, (4) the near absence of significant tectonic, metamorphic and magmatic age gradients across Archaean cratons, (5) the relative homogeneity of strain across large areas, and (6) the ubiquitous presence of crustal-scale strike slip faults in many Late Archaean cratons.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many thanks to Y. Poujdom Djomani, B. Griffin and S. O’Reilly for enlightening discussions on the evolution through time of the density of the SCLM. Thanks to S. Buiter, S. Costa, R. Pysklywec and M. Sandiford for their constructive comments of the first draft of this manuscript. Special thanks are due to K. Stu? we whose thorough review considerably improved its final version. This work was supported by ARC Large Grant N8: A10017138


here to return to my Home Page.